"That's not Art!" : A Speech I Never Gave.
Sunday, March 30, 2008 at 12:29PM I have a good number of notebooks lying around, Moleskines and others, interesting Paris-in-the-20s distressed covers, each bought for a project or a trip. (Or sometimes I bought them hoping to precipitate a project.) Generally they are filled up to about page 8, with a fountain pen if I remembered to bring one. The first pages gather thoughts around a particular idea, but by the end they are a stew of phone numbers in the city where I am, train schedules, international dialing codes, museum hours, and addresses of taxidermists antiquarian book dealers and friends-of-friends.
I found one of these under a chair this morning and opened it. It contains notes for a speech but I can’t tell at all who the speech was meant for, or if I ever gave it, which is a little embarrassing. But the notes got me thinking. You too, maybe. Here they are, unedited…well, maybe a little.
The Speech
The first impulse is not to have a career, it is to know stuff and grow. It is wired in. We have in us the genetic structure that makes possible vision and speech, and we just have to start the pendulum swinging. Don’t have to to take a class in it. It just happens when we move around, look around. It is like some kind of inverse gravity that pulls upward.
Diane Arbus: “When I make money from a photograph I assume it is not a good photograph.”
Things to learn from Diane A (but don’t do like she did if you can possibly help it.)
She didn’t like to show (sell) work, she liked to give it to people who liked it. Just as well because her first portfolio, editioned at 50, sold 3.
Commercial photogs liked to talk about her because she represented a part of them that they mostly withheld energy from. Avedon was a huge admirer and supporter. At her funeral he said, “I’d like to be an artist like Diane.” Someone replied, “No you wouldn’t, Richard.”
Speech needs to state the notion of reality as constructed , not something ultimate.
To state the true natures of art and commerce and of how one can hold those two in the mind at the same time. Simple answer: don’t ever conflate the two, or insist that commerce be artistic or art be commercial. (Second is tougher.) They do touch at their edges, but not in their ultimate natures.
In commercial work, people do what they should, and there is no bad behavior, nothing extreme. In art people wind up doing what they ought not, what they don't expect to do, and there are oddities and extremes and contradictions, and that’s what makes it fuller, truer. Writers don’t begin with grammar or coherence of structure. They begin by burning with something they need, not so much to say but to find about.
A way to stay alive? Look at pictures, not for what they’re of or how they were made, but for the Change. If you do this, you can start to get a sense of what is seen new and what just fills the requirements.
One thing that seems to announce that art is in a work is that someone says, “That’s not art!” (Thinking of Chris Burden.)
Art is a freighted term, so maybe use something else. Call it Life—or Wake Up! Call it such-ness, awareness-for-it’s-own-sake.
Sean Kernan |
1 Comment | 






